Logo
 
Virginia Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy

Home > Federal Requirements

The Eight Required Elements to include in Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plans

Congress identified the required elements of this conservation strategy in the WCRP legislation and the USFWS adopted those same elements to also apply to SWG required conservation plans, so one document will satisfy both needs. The Plan-Strategy must identify and be focused on the “species in greatest need of conservation,” yet address the “full array of wildlife” and wildlife-related issues. They must provide and make use of:

  1. information on the distribution and abundance of species of wildlife, including low and declining populations as the State fish and wildlife agency deems appropriate, that are indicative of the diversity and health of the State’s wildlife; and
  2. descriptions of locations and relative condition of key habitats and community types essential to conservation of species identified in (1); and
  3. descriptions of problems which may adversely affect species identified in (1) or their habitats, and priority research and survey efforts needed to identify factors which may assist in restoration and improved conservation of these species and habitats; and
  4. descriptions of conservation actions determined to be necessary to conserve the identified species and habitats and priorities for implementing such actions; and
  5. proposed plans for monitoring species identified in (1) and their habitats, for monitoring the effectiveness of the conservation actions proposed in (4), and for adapting these conservation actions to respond appropriately to new information or changing conditions; and
  6. descriptions of procedures to review the Plan-Strategy at intervals not to exceed ten years; and
  7. plans for coordinating, to the extent feasible, the development, implementation, review, and revision of the Plan-Strategy with Federal, State, and local agencies and Indian tribes that manage significant land and water areas within the State or administer programs that significantly affect the conservation of identified species and habitats.
  8. Congress has affirmed through WCRP and SWG, that broad public participation is an essential element of developing and implementing these Plans-Strategies, the projects that are carried out while these Plans-Strategies are developed, and the Species in Greatest Need of Conservation that Congress has indicated such programs and projects are intended to emphasize.

The International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies has also issued guidance to the states in the form of the document "Guiding Principles (PDF)" for States to Consider in Developing Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plans and Wildlife Conservation Strategies

Some of the recommendations are:

  • develop broad public-private partnerships;
  • share responsibility and credit among all partners;
  • ensure that the plan-strategy is dynamic so it can be updated as new information is identified;
  • base the plan-strategy in the principles of “best science”, “best management practices, and “adaptive management”;
  • address the broad range of wildlife and associated habitats, with appropriate priority placed on those species of greatest conservation need;
  • coordinate with parallel efforts in other states and countries;
  • combine landscape/ecosystem/habitat-based approaches and smaller-scale approaches for planning and implementation;
  • make full and effective use of relevant existing information;
  • identify knowledge gaps;
  • make the plan-strategy spatially explicit to the extent possible;
  • make the plan-strategy readily available to the public in a variety of media; and
  • ensure that the plan-strategy can be implemented, i.e., that it is feasible and has sufficient resources.

The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service has developed a National Acceptance Team (NAAT) that will be responsible for reviewing the strategies and deciding whether they are approved or need revision. A reference guide has been developed to assist the NAAT in reviewing the plans.